AI BENCHY
Comparar Gráficos Metodologia
❤️ Made by XCS
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Categoria AI BENCHY

Ranking de Seguimento de instruções

Veja quais modelos de IA vão melhor em Seguimento de instruções, quais permanecem confiáveis e onde aparecem as maiores diferenças.

Modelos exibidos

55

Média de Pontuação de Seguimento de instruções

8.1

Motivos de falha relacionados

Posição Modelo Empresa Pontuação de Seguimento de instruções Pontuação média Testes corretos Tempo de resposta (médio)
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 10.0 10.0 2/2 6.10s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 10.0 9.4 2/2 9.56s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 10.0 8.4 2/2 3.04s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 10.0 8.3 2/2 31.9s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 10.0 8.2 2/2 19.7s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 10.0 8.0 2/2 3.11s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.7 2/2 9.88s
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 7.7 2/2 2.61s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 2/2 1.91s
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 10.0 7.4 2/2 7.25s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 10.0 7.3 2/2 1.49s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 10.0 7.3 2/2 35.8s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 10.0 7.2 2/2 4.28s
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 10.0 7.1 2/2 1.13s
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 10.0 6.9 2/2 17.5s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 10.0 6.9 2/2 63.5s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 6.6 2/2 2.43s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 10.0 6.4 2/2 92.5s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 10.0 6.2 2/2 1.67s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 10.0 6.0 2/2 1.48s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 10.0 5.5 2/2 1.52s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 10.0 5.5 2/2 24.4s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 10.0 5.3 2/2 1.07s
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 10.0 2.9 0/2 923ms
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 9.5 8.2 2/2 7.02s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 9.5 8.2 2/2 3.26s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 9.5 7.4 2/2 2.62s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 9.5 6.5 2/2 3.12s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 9.5 5.1 2/2 7.63s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 9.0 8.2 1/2 70.1s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 9.0 7.4 1/2 4.98s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 9.0 7.3 1/2 3.29s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 9.0 5.5 1/2 11.9s
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 9.0 5.2 1/2 672ms
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 8.0 4.7 1/2 4.64s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 7.5 6.0 1/2 15.7s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 6.0 7.4 1/2 5.46s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 5.5 7.2 1/2 1.58s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 5.5 6.8 1/2 1.96s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 5.5 6.2 1/2 5.30s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 5.5 4.5 1/2 1.07s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 5.5 4.1 1/2 2.67s
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 5.5 3.9 1/2 888ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 5.5 3.4 1/2 551ms
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 5.5 2.9 1/2 857ms
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 5.0 5.2 1/2 8.81s
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 5.0 4.7 1/2 809ms
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 5.0 3.1 1/2 2.97s
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 4.5 5.0 0/2 585ms
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 4.5 4.9 0/2 815ms
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 4.5 4.0 0/2 1.27s
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 4.5 4.0 0/2 7.71s
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 4.5 3.5 0/2 7.34s
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 4.5 2.6 0/2 1.09s
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 3.5 4.2 0/2 1.09s

Melhores modelos por Pontuação de Seguimento de instruções

Pontuação de Seguimento de instruções vs custo total

Melhores modelos por Tempo de resposta (médio)