#47 Qwen3.6 Flash
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.008
- Time
- 29.9s
- Tokens
- 6,784 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Samenvatting
Benchmarkvergelijking Qwen3.6 Flash vs GLM 5.2: Qwen3.6 Flash leidt in gemiddelde score met 7.5 vs 7.1. GLM 5.2 heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.076 vs $0.288. GLM 5.2 is sneller met 6.34s vs 19.25s, met slagingspercentages van 71.4% vs 60.3%.
Aanbevolen model: GLM 5.2 - De score blijft dicht bij de beste score hier (7.1 vs 7.5) en het kost ongeveer 3.8x minder dan Qwen3.6 Flash.
Benchmarks gegenereerd uit AI BENCHY-testsuites op: 2026-06-17
| Metriek | Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.5 | 7.1 |
| Rang | #47 | #61 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Consistentie | 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 71.4% | 60.3% |
| Instabiele tests | 5 | 1 |
| Totaal runs | 63 | 63 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 3.030 | 0.628 |
| Totale kosten | $0.288 | $0.076 |
| Invoerprijs | $0.188 / 1M | $1.400 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $1.125 / 1M | $4.400 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 42,362 | 38,671 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 2,995 | 4,817 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 245,358 | 0 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 19.25s | 6.34s |
| Responstijd (max) | 122.87s | 20.69s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 404.20s | 133.19s |
Generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#61 GLM 5.2
none
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.033
- Time
- 87.7s
- Tokens
- 7,455 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.10s | 672 | 624 | 14,024 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 3.70s | 567 | 313 | 0 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 5.0 | 5.1 | 44.5% | 2 | 42.85s | 7,895 | 495 | 67,967 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.7 | 9.5 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.55s | 7,263 | 1,958 | 0 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.28s | 14,934 | 483 | 13,839 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.69s | 14,296 | 1,489 | 0 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.65s | 7,782 | 270 | 13,155 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.17s | 7,113 | 204 | 0 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.5 | 4.4 | 33.3% | 2 | 14.65s | 771 | 60 | 24,409 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 6.50s | 696 | 27 | 0 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 4.8 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 9.88s | 516 | 140 | 5,445 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 4.42s | 480 | 82 | 0 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.05s | 699 | 102 | 7,423 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.84s | 642 | 66 | 0 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 6.29s | 696 | 460 | 10,860 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.31s | 618 | 265 | 0 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.00s | 8,193 | 335 | 1,188 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.76s | 6,807 | 400 | 0 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 122.87s | 204 | 26 | 87,048 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.41s | 189 | 13 | 0 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
Gemma 4 26B A4BmediumGratis beschikbaarvsGLM 5.2noneMiMo-V2-FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2noneStep 3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2noneGPT-5.3 ChatnonevsQwen3.6 FlashmediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumKimi K2.7 CodemediumvsGLM 5.2noneDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsQwen3.6 FlashmediumGrok 4.20mediumvsGLM 5.2noneQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.8nonevsQwen3.6 FlashmediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowvsGLM 5.2none