- Rang
- #288
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 932,619
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 75.86s
- Totale kosten
- $0.592
Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs MiniMax M2.5 (medium)
Trinity Large Thinking (high) leidt in gemiddelde score met 4.8 vs 4.6. MiniMax M2.5 (medium) heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.363 vs $0.592. MiniMax M2.5 (medium) is sneller met 69.08s vs 75.86s, met slagingspercentages van 39.4% vs 43.9%.
Vergeleken modellen
- Rang
- #300
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 272,229
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 69.08s
- Totale kosten
- $0.363
Aanbevolen model
MiniMax M2.5 (medium)
De score blijft dicht bij de beste score hier (4.6 vs 4.8) en het kost ongeveer 1.6x minder dan Trinity Large Thinking (high).
Gedetailleerde vergelijking
| Metriek | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high | MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Rang | #288 | #300 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistentie | 7.2 | 6.6 |
| Pogingen | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 39.4% | 43.9% |
| Instabiele tests | 8 | 9 |
| Totaal runs | 66 | 66 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 12.473 | 6.463 |
| Totale kosten | $0.592 | $0.363 |
| Invoerprijs | $0.250 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $0.800 / 1M | $1.200 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 101,776 | 142,621 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 276,367 | 20,409 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 656,252 | 251,820 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 75.86s | 69.08s |
| Responstijd (max) | 510.21s | 251.36s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 1668.93s | 1036.24s |
| Parameters | 398B totaal (13B actief) | 230B totaal (10B actief) |
| Beschikbaarheid | Gewichten beschikbaar | Gewichten beschikbaar |
Model generatie-showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#288 Trinity Large Thinking
high- Kosten
- $0.028
- Tijd
- 130.1s
- Tokens
- 34,387 tok
#300 MiniMax M2.5
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Kosten
- $0.000
- Tijd
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.7 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 4.13s | 663 | 3,108 | 7,565 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7.9 | 6.3 | 83.3% | 2 | 20.82s | 612 | 286 | 45,344 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 245.04s | 7,204 | 83,616 | 266,836 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.4 | 9.1 | 0.0% | 0 | 188.58s | 6,076 | 357 | 106,177 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 262.39s | 76,626 | 14,706 | 149,243 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 50.0% | 2 | 83.19s | 119,959 | 16,687 | 18,834 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 13.98s | 6,906 | 580 | 9,338 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 66.7% | 2 | 7.48s | 6,584 | 266 | 3,835 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 66.94s | 756 | 163,364 | 166,091 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 158.88s | 368 | 14 | 45,372 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.90s | 501 | 5,700 | 5,942 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 1 | 6.63s | 492 | 25 | 1,686 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.12s | 684 | 88 | 2,853 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 621ms | 699 | 156 | 1,495 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.7 | 5.2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3.84s | 678 | 2,566 | 3,368 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 11.21s | 495 | 1,069 | 9,605 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.96s | 7,551 | 282 | 1,440 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.35s | 7,123 | 269 | 937 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 125.13s | 207 | 2,357 | 43,576 | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 80.79s | 213 | 1,280 | 18,535 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 NanononeTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowGratis beschikbaarTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing-2.6-1TnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneGranite 4.2 8BhighvsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsHy4 previewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneMiniMax M2.5mediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneGratis beschikbaarTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3 SupernoneGratis beschikbaarTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsLing-2.6-flashnoneMercury 2nonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymedium