#297 Qwen3.7 Flash
none- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 34.0s
- Tokens
- 4,814 tok
Qwen
Release: 2026-07-28
Tested on: 2026-10-01 00:52
qwen/qwen3.7-flash::none
~35B total (~3B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Qwen3.7 Flash scores 5.9 on AI BENCHY and ranks #297. It has 10.0 reliability, a 36.2% pass rate, $0.028 total cost, and 14.70s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.7 Flash unique: It stands out most in General Intelligence, where it ranks #1, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #17.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~35B total (~3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the released Flash-class architecture.
5.9
Consistency
9.0
10.0
$0.028
Total Output Tokens
117,742
Total Input Tokens
410,787
Input Price
$0.030 / 1M
Output Price
$0.130 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.006 / 1M
Cache Write Price
$0.039 / 1M
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 00:52 Re-test | 5.9 | 10.0 | $0.028 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-28 08:57 Initial run | 6.1 | 10.0 | $0.019 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 00:52 · Current run | 69/69 attempts | 5.9 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 7/23 | 3 | 117,742 | 410,787 | $0.028 | 14.70s |
| 2026-07-28 08:57 · Initial run | 66/66 attempts | 6.1 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 7/22 | 2 | 90,507 | 218,731 | $0.019 | 10.06s |
| Difference | — | -0.3 | -0.2 | 0.0 | 0 | +1 | +27235 | +192056 | +$0.010 | +4641ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 69/69 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.030 / 1M | $0.130 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $0.030 / 1M | $0.130 / 1M | $0.006 / 1M | $0.039 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.7 FlashnonevsNemotron 3 UltranoneFree AvailableQwen3.7 FlashnonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextnoneQwen3.7 FlashnonevsClaude Sonnet 5noneQwen3.7 FlashnonevsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017noneQwen3.7 FlashnonevsQwen3.6 FlashnoneQwen3.7 FlashnonevsGPT-5.6 TerranoneQwen3.7 FlashnonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LitenoneQwen3.7 FlashnonevsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashnoneQwen3.7 Flashnonevsgpt-oss-120bmediumQwen3.7 FlashnonevsLing 3.0 Flashhigh
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 4.7 | 3.1 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 3.0 | 7.9 | |
| Coding | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.8 | 5.8 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 3.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |