Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.062. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.73s vs 10.05s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#204
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.73s
Total Cost
$0.062
Rank
#199
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.05s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 2.7x faster than Qwen3.7 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #204 #199
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 36.4%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.935 0.262
Total Cost $0.062 $0.019
Input Price $0.188 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $1.125 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 139,797 218,740
Output Tokens 30,947 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.73s 10.05s
Response Time (max) 48.79s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 81.95s 221.13s
Parameters ~35B total (~3B active) ~35B total (~3B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#204 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

#199 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair