Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.062. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 10.06s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.06s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 2.7x faster than Qwen3.7 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #139 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 36.4%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.935 0.262
Total Cost $0.062 $0.019
Input Price $0.188 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $1.125 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 139,788 218,731
Output Tokens 30,947 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.74s 10.06s
Response Time (max) 48.79s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 82.38s 221.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#139 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair