- Rank
- #263
- Total Output Tokens
- 943,044
- Response Time (avg)
- 74.52s
- Total Cost
- $0.794
Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash leads on average score with 5.9 vs 5.7. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.028 vs $0.794. Qwen3.7 Flash is faster at 14.70s vs 74.52s, with pass rates of 42.0% vs 36.2%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #257
- Total Output Tokens
- 117,742
- Response Time (avg)
- 14.70s
- Total Cost
- $0.028
Recommended model
Qwen3.7 Flash
It has the best score here (5.9), while costing about 28.7x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high | Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.7 | 5.9 |
| Rank | #263 | #257 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.3 | 9.0 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 42.0% | 36.2% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 11.289 | 0.395 |
| Total Cost | $0.794 | $0.028 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.030 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.800 / 1M | $0.130 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | $0.060 / 1M | $0.006 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | $0.039 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 283,116 | 410,787 |
| Output Tokens | 277,920 | 117,742 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 665,124 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 74.52s | 14.70s |
| Response Time (max) | 510.21s | 186.24s |
| Response Time (total) | 1713.90s | 338.13s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | ~35B total (~3B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#263 Trinity Large Thinking
high- Cost
- $0.028
- Time
- 130.1s
- Tokens
- 34,387 tok
#257 Qwen3.7 Flash
none- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 34.0s
- Tokens
- 4,814 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 44.97s | 181,340 | 1,553 | 8,872 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 4.7 | 3.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 117.01s | 192,047 | 27,235 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.7 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 4.13s | 663 | 3,108 | 7,565 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 3.0 | 7.9 | 8.3% | 1 | 2.55s | 696 | 1,627 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 245.04s | 7,204 | 83,616 | 266,836 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 1.55s | 7,911 | 855 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 262.39s | 76,626 | 14,706 | 149,243 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 3.8 | 5.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 94.59s | 191,173 | 86,701 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 13.98s | 6,906 | 580 | 9,338 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.09s | 7,794 | 243 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 66.94s | 756 | 163,364 | 166,091 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 814ms | 798 | 15 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.90s | 501 | 5,700 | 5,942 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 963ms | 522 | 86 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.12s | 684 | 88 | 2,853 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 892ms | 711 | 66 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.7 | 5.2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3.84s | 678 | 2,566 | 3,368 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 3.7 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.39s | 714 | 633 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.96s | 7,551 | 282 | 1,440 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.80s | 8,211 | 272 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 125.13s | 207 | 2,357 | 43,576 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 766ms | 210 | 9 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing 2.6 1tmediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5 NanomediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 MininoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsSeed 2.1 TurbononeTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsDots 3 Note PreviewmediumFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsDeepSeek V4.1 Flashnonegpt-oss-120bmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.6 TerranoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsSpace Bunny AlphalowLing 3.0 FlashhighvsQwen3.7 Flashnone