Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.046. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.75s vs 10.06s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#137
Total Output Tokens
10,723
Response Time (avg)
1.75s
Total Cost
$0.046
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.06s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 5.7x faster than Qwen3.7 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #137 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 36.4%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.507 0.262
Total Cost $0.046 $0.019
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,050 218,731
Output Tokens 10,723 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.75s 10.06s
Response Time (max) 16.25s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 38.60s 221.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#137 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.5s
Tokens
727 tok

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 938ms 8,128 666 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair