#90 Qwen3.6 Flash
none- Cost
- $0.005
- Time
- 20.1s
- Tokens
- 4,211 tok
Summary
Qwen3.6 Flash scores 5.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #90. It has 10.0 reliability, a 38.9% pass rate, $0.018 total cost, and 1.65s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.6 Flash unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Puzzle Solving is its weakest area at #11.
5.8
Consistency
10.0
10.0
$0.018
Total Output Tokens
4,161
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$1.500 / 1M
Flaky tests
0
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Generation showcase
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:17 New test added | 5.4 | 10.0 | $0.015 ↓ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:50 Suite changed | 5.5 | 9.7 | $0.019 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-27 23:05 Initial run | 5.8 | 10.0 | $0.018 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-27 23:05 · Initial run | 5.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 7/18 | 0 | 4,161 | 0 | $0.018 | 1.65s |
| 2026-05-21 23:50 · Suite changed | 5.5 | 10.0 | 9.7 | 7/20 | 0 | 4,186 | 0 | $0.019 | 1.64s |
| Difference | +0.2 | 0.0 | +0.3 | 0 | 0 | -25 | 0 | -$0.001 | +10ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 3.1 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.3 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 3.5 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |