Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.6 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.046 vs $0.062. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.75s vs 3.74s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#133
Total Output Tokens
10,723
Response Time (avg)
1.75s
Total Cost
$0.046
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 2.1x faster than Qwen3.6 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #133 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 34.9%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.507 0.935
Total Cost $0.046 $0.062
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,050 139,788
Output Tokens 10,723 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.75s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 16.25s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 38.60s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#133 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.5s
Tokens
727 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 938ms 8,128 666 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair