Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Seed-2.0-Lite leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.066. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 4.40s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelSeed-2.0-LiteIt has the strongest score in this comparison (6.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #127 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 34.9%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.814 0.935
Total Cost $0.066 $0.062
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,197 139,788
Output Tokens 14,746 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.40s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 96.84s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#127 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair