Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.6 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.095. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 3.87s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#140
Total Output Tokens
9,474
Response Time (avg)
3.87s
Total Cost
$0.095
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 1.6x less than Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Detailed comparison

Metric Nemotron 3 Ultra Nemotron 3 Ultra none Release: 2026-06-04 Free Available Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #140 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 34.9%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.935
Total Cost $0.095 $0.062
Input Price $0.600 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $3.600 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,275 139,788
Output Tokens 9,474 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.87s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 37.50s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 85.15s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#140 Nemotron 3 Ultra

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
149.6s
Tokens
3,405 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Nemotron 3 Ultra 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.02s 7,623 369 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair