Navigate
Advertise here

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.6 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.093. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.73s vs 3.88s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-08

Compared models

Rank
#203
Total Output Tokens
9,470
Response Time (avg)
3.88s
Total Cost
$0.093
Rank
#200
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.73s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 1.5x less than Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Detailed comparison

Metric Nemotron 3 Ultra Nemotron 3 Ultra none Release: 2026-06-04 Free Available Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #203 #200
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 34.9%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.935
Total Cost $0.093 $0.062
Input Price $0.625 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $3.125 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,168 139,797
Output Tokens 9,470 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.88s 3.73s
Response Time (max) 37.50s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 85.33s 81.95s
Parameters 550B total (55B active) ~35B total (~3B active)
Availability Weights available Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#203 Nemotron 3 Ultra

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
149.6s
Tokens
3,405 tok

#200 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Nemotron 3 Ultra 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.02s 7,623 369 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair