#112 Qwen3.6 35B A3B
none- Cost
- $0.008
- Time
- 30.1s
- Tokens
- 6,317 tok
Summary
Qwen3.6 35B A3B scores 5.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #112. It has 10.0 reliability, a 39.6% pass rate, $0.019 total cost, and 2.87s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.6 35B A3B unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Combined is its weakest area at #14.
5.1
Consistency
7.4
10.0
$0.019
Total Output Tokens
17,503
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.162 / 1M
Output Price
$0.966 / 1M
Flaky tests
5
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Generation showcase
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:19 New test added | 4.6 | 10.0 | $0.031 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:54 Suite changed | 4.9 | 10.0 | $0.030 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-27 23:05 Initial run | 5.1 | 10.0 | $0.019 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-27 23:05 · Initial run | 5.1 | 7.4 | 10.0 | 4/16 | 5 | 17,503 | 0 | $0.019 | 2.87s |
| 2026-05-21 23:54 · Suite changed | 4.9 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 4/18 | 5 | 27,747 | 0 | $0.030 | 3.83s |
| Difference | +0.2 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -10244 | 0 | -$0.011 | -955ms |
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 3.6 | 7.6 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 3.5 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.4 | 3.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.2 | 5.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 3.2 | 9.9 | |
| Tool Calling | 0.0 | 0.0 |