Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 5.4 vs 5.3. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.061 vs $0.142. GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 1.50s vs 5.52s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#172
Total Output Tokens
6,709
Response Time (avg)
1.50s
Total Cost
$0.142
Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Recommended model GPT-5.6 Luna

It has the best score here (5.4), while responding about 3.7x faster than Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna none Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.4 5.3
Rank #172 #175
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 31.8%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.360 1.496
Total Cost $0.142 $0.061
Input Price $1.000 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,323 93,979
Output Tokens 6,709 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.50s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 10.57s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 32.91s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#172 GPT-5.6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
15.8s
Tokens
2,685 tok

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.8 7.2 22.2% 1 980ms 7,302 459 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair