Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 5.3 vs 5.3. Laguna XS 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.061. Laguna XS 2.1 is faster at 1.55s vs 5.52s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#174
Total Output Tokens
13,377
Response Time (avg)
1.55s
Total Cost
$0.008
Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Recommended model Laguna XS 2.1

It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 8.5x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-02 Free Available Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.3 5.3
Rank #174 #175
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 31.8%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.143 1.496
Total Cost $0.008 $0.061
Input Price $0.060 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.120 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 91,598 93,979
Output Tokens 13,377 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.55s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 19.02s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 34.19s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#174 Laguna XS 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
27.6s
Tokens
4,344 tok

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna XS 2.1 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 623ms 7,995 562 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair