Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 5.3 vs 5.3. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.105 vs $0.262. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 8.43s vs 35.86s, with pass rates of 29.0% vs 29.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-07

Compared models

Rank
#299
Total Output Tokens
49,389
Response Time (avg)
35.86s
Total Cost
$0.262
Rank
#302
Total Output Tokens
63,781
Response Time (avg)
8.43s
Total Cost
$0.105
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 2.5x less than Kimi K2.5.

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 none Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.3 5.3
Rank #299 #302
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 29.0% 29.0%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 4.976 2.586
Total Cost $0.262 $0.105
Input Price $0.450 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $2.250 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.070 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 275,349 272,479
Output Tokens 49,377 40,677
Reasoning Tokens 12 23,104
Response Time (avg) 35.86s 8.43s
Response Time (max) 321.19s 65.61s
Response Time (total) 609.61s 176.93s
Parameters 1T total (32B active) 35B total (3B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#299 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

none
Cost
$0.015
Time
89.1s
Tokens
5,421 tok

#302 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 24.56s 7,311 4,708 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 960 10,201

Switch Comparison Pair