Navigate
Advertise here

Granite 4.2 8B (low) vs Kimi K2.5

The average score is effectively tied at 5.3 vs 5.3. Granite 4.2 8B (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.036 vs $0.236. Kimi K2.5 is faster at 35.86s vs 58.20s, with pass rates of 33.3% vs 29.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#280
Total Output Tokens
61,351
Response Time (avg)
58.20s
Total Cost
$0.036
Rank
#281
Total Output Tokens
49,389
Response Time (avg)
35.86s
Total Cost
$0.236
Recommended model Granite 4.2 8B (low)

It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 6.7x less than Kimi K2.5.

Detailed comparison

Metric Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B low Release: 2026-09-02 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 none Release: 2026-01-27
Score 5.3 5.3
Rank #280 #281
Reliability 9.2 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 33.3% 29.0%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.508 4.976
Total Cost $0.036 $0.236
Input Price $0.060 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $0.250 / 1M $2.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 332,917 275,349
Output Tokens 18,989 49,389
Reasoning Tokens 42,362 0
Response Time (avg) 58.20s 35.86s
Response Time (max) 566.80s 321.19s
Response Time (total) 1338.65s 609.61s
Parameters 8B 1T total (32B active)
Availability Open source Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#280 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B

low
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.2s
Tokens
0 tok

#281 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

none
Cost
$0.015
Time
89.1s
Tokens
5,421 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Granite 4.2 8B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 13.01s 8,439 2,469 2,984
Kimi K2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 24.56s 7,311 4,708 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair