Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 27B (low) vs GLM 5 (medium)

Qwen3.8 27B (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.9 vs 7.7. Qwen3.8 27B (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di ~$0.071 vs $0.228. GLM 5 (medium) lebih cepat di 33.54s vs 39.11s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 68.2% vs 78.8%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-08-20

Peringkat
#61
Total token output
169,329
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
39.11s
Total Biaya
~$0.071
Peringkat
#72
Total token output
124,566
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
33.54s
Total Biaya
$0.228
Model yang direkomendasikan Qwen3.8 27B (low)

It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 3.2x less than GLM 5 (medium).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B low Rilis: 2026-08-14 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Rilis: 2026-02-12
Skor 7.9 7.7
Peringkat #61 #72
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 10.0 8.1
Percobaan 66/66 63/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 68.2% 78.8%
Tes tidak stabil 0 4
Total Run 66 63
Biaya per hasil ~0.473 1.668
Total Biaya ~$0.071 $0.228
Harga input T/A $0.600 / 1M
Harga output T/A $1.920 / 1M
Total token input 99,705 35,224
Token output 1,545 21,570
Token penalaran 167,784 102,996
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 39.11s 33.54s
Waktu respons (maks) 376.04s 99.85s
Waktu respons (total) 860.51s 435.99s
Parameter 27.3B 744B total (40B aktif)
Ketersediaan Bobot tersedia Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#61 Qwen3.8 27B

low
Biaya
~$0.003
Waktu
92.8s
Token
6,902 tok

#72 GLM 5

medium
Biaya
$0.005
Waktu
20.7s
Token
2,068 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Qwen3.8 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 140.92s 8,127 585 86,694
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Seed-2.0-CodelowvsGLM 5mediumQwen3.8 27BlowvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsQwen3.8 27BlowKimi K3maxvsQwen3.8 27BlowQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5mediumGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsQwen3.8 27BlowGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowQwen3.8 27BlowvsGLM 5.2mediumQwen3.8 27BlowvsInklingmediumDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsGLM 5mediumGPT-5.6 TerramediumvsQwen3.8 27Blow