Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.106 vs $0.122. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B lebih cepat di 12.72s vs 13.56s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 43.9% vs 43.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.5-35B-A3BIt has the strongest score in this comparison (6.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Rilis: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 6.1 6.1
Peringkat #138 #137
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.6 8.7
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 43.9% 43.9%
Tes tidak stabil 4 4
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 1.578 1.636
Total Biaya $0.106 $0.122
Harga input $0.140 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Harga output $1.000 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total token input 134,521 94,468
Token output 86,614 51,487
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 12.72s 13.56s
Waktu respons (maks) 209.15s 206.05s
Waktu respons (total) 279.90s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#138 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

none
Biaya
$0.005
Waktu
28.4s
Token
4,518 tok

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Biaya
$0.008
Waktu
77.0s
Token
4,369 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,808 571 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan