Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.1 vs 7.2. Qwen3.7 Plus memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.106 vs $1.046. Qwen3.7 Plus lebih cepat di 12.09s vs 64.16s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 71.2% vs 50.0%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.7 PlusIt has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 9.9x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Rilis: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Rilis: 2026-06-03
Skor 7.1 7.2
Peringkat #71 #70
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.5 10.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 71.2% 50.0%
Tes tidak stabil 4 0
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 8.509 1.014
Total Biaya $1.046 $0.106
Harga input $0.260 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Harga output $2.080 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total token input 124,771 98,824
Token output 44,077 58,097
Token penalaran 443,141 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 64.16s 12.09s
Waktu respons (maks) 519.30s 206.03s
Waktu respons (total) 1411.60s 265.89s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

medium
Biaya
$0.019
Waktu
48.7s
Token
6,034 tok

#70 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Biaya
$0.019
Waktu
213.5s
Token
11,960 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 114.48s 7,630 8,057 82,578
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan