#53 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
high- Biaya
- $0.009
- Waktu
- 26.4s
- Token
- 3,117 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Ringkasan
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.7 vs 7.7. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.246 vs $0.588. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high) lebih cepat di 12.30s vs 42.49s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 63.5% vs 73.0%.
Model yang direkomendasikanKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.7), while costing about 2.4x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #53 | #46 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 63.5% | 73.0% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 3 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 2.228 | 5.235 |
| Total Biaya | $0.246 | $0.588 |
| Harga input | $0.740 / 1M | $0.260 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.960 / 1M | $2.080 / 1M |
| Total token input | 42,750 | 41,832 |
| Token output | 2,509 | 26,187 |
| Token penalaran | 69,594 | 251,028 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 12.30s | 42.49s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 95.65s | 168.16s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 258.34s | 892.30s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#46 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
medium- Biaya
- $0.019
- Waktu
- 48.7s
- Token
- 6,034 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 6.4 | 7.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 22.00s | 7,893 | 422 | 20,461 | |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | 6.0 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 114.48s | 7,630 | 8,057 | 82,578 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGPT-5.6 TerralowvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGPT-5.6 TerralowQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGPT-5.6 LunahighvsQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGrok 4.3mediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsMiniMax M3mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highQwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsGrok 4.5lowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGrok Build 0.1medium