#44 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
medium- Biaya
- $0.003
- Waktu
- 5.3s
- Token
- 1,754 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
Ringkasan
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.8 vs 7.7. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.071 vs $0.246. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium) lebih cepat di 3.23s vs 12.30s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 65.1% vs 63.5%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 3.5x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (high).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite medium | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #44 | #53 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 65.1% | 63.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 5 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.539 | 2.228 |
| Total Biaya | $0.071 | $0.246 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.740 / 1M |
| Harga output | $1.500 / 1M | $2.960 / 1M |
| Total token input | 36,808 | 42,750 |
| Token output | 2,254 | 2,509 |
| Token penalaran | 38,300 | 69,594 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 3.23s | 12.30s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 10.87s | 95.65s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 67.80s | 258.34s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#53 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
high- Biaya
- $0.009
- Waktu
- 26.4s
- Token
- 3,117 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 3.81s | 8,134 | 459 | 8,978 | |
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 6.4 | 7.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 22.00s | 7,893 | 422 | 20,461 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 4.8lowvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGPT-5.6 TerralowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGrok 4.3mediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsGrok 4.5lowGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsGPT-5.6 TerralowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsMiniMax M3mediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 4.8lowvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsGPT-5.6 LunahighKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsQwen3.5-122B-A10Bmedium