- Peringkat
- #128
- Total token output
- 16,797
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 4.92s
- Total Biaya
- $1.166
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.3 vs 7.3. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.120 vs $1.166. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium) lebih cepat di 4.38s vs 4.92s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 63.6% vs 62.1%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #125
- Total token output
- 62,356
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 4.38s
- Total Biaya
- $0.120
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (medium)
It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 9.7x less than Claude Opus 4.8.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| Peringkat | #128 | #125 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 63.6% | 62.1% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 2 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 8.969 | 0.922 |
| Total Biaya | $1.166 | $0.120 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M |
| Harga output | $25.000 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
| Total token input | 149,203 | 104,925 |
| Token output | 16,797 | 9,168 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 53,188 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 4.92s | 4.38s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 35.03s | 26.22s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 108.24s | 96.32s |
| Parameter | ~5T total (~500B aktif) | ~150B total (~10B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#128 Claude Opus 4.8
none- Biaya
- $0.053
- Waktu
- 22.0s
- Token
- 2,253 tok
#125 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
medium- Biaya
- $0.003
- Waktu
- 5.3s
- Token
- 1,754 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 3.40s | 834 | 1,472 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 9.1 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 2.39s | 502 | 604 | 4,201 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 3.29s | 10,590 | 1,332 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 3.81s | 8,134 | 459 | 8,978 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 26.38s | 111,760 | 11,949 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 7.2 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 18.55s | 80,983 | 7,241 | 20,231 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 1.77s | 10,503 | 308 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.60s | 7,362 | 279 | 2,845 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 1.76s | 972 | 61 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 3.93s | 650 | 15 | 7,223 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.48s | 708 | 230 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.60s | 488 | 84 | 1,142 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.37s | 909 | 95 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.59s | 623 | 75 | 3,320 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 2.74s | 894 | 783 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 7.6 | 7.2 | 77.8% | 1 | 1.95s | 568 | 165 | 2,450 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.35s | 11,775 | 355 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.55s | 5,457 | 234 | 921 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.41s | 258 | 212 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.08s | 158 | 12 | 1,877 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Gemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashhighGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsQwen3.7 PlusnoneClaude Opus 4.8nonevsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumClaude Opus 4.8nonevsKimi K2.6mediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowClaude Opus 4.8nonevsGLM 5.3 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8nonevsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsGLM 5.3highClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumClaude Opus 4.8nonevsMuse Glimmer 30BhighClaude Opus 4.8nonevsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsGrok 4.6low