Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.5 vs 6.5. Laguna XS 2.1 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.068 vs $0.082. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) lebih cepat di 32.20s vs 47.93s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 42.4% vs 69.7%.

Model yang direkomendasikanMiMo-V2.5 (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-22

Metrik Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 medium Rilis: 2026-07-02 Tersedia gratis MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Rilis: 2026-04-22
Skor 6.5 6.5
Peringkat #108 #107
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.6 7.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 42.4% 69.7%
Tes tidak stabil 1 6
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.746 3.124
Total Biaya $0.068 $0.082
Harga input $0.060 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Harga output $0.120 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total token input 118,989 105,447
Token output 30,750 7,120
Token penalaran 491,833 230,682
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 47.93s 32.20s
Waktu respons (maks) 422.72s 162.44s
Waktu respons (total) 1054.49s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#108 Laguna XS 2.1

medium
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
30.6s
Token
4,678 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
54.8s
Token
5,247 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Laguna XS 2.1 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 70.35s 7,995 23,767 83,258
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan