Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.5 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.082 vs $0.646. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) lebih cepat di 16.70s vs 32.20s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 59.1% vs 69.7%.

Model yang direkomendasikanMiMo-V2.5 (medium)It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 7.9x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-21

Metrik Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Rilis: 2026-03-03 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Rilis: 2026-04-22
Skor 6.5 6.5
Peringkat #110 #107
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 10.0 7.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 59.1% 69.7%
Tes tidak stabil 0 6
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 4.969 3.124
Total Biaya $0.646 $0.082
Harga input $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Harga output $1.500 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total token input 110,185 105,447
Token output 14,717 7,120
Token penalaran 397,483 230,682
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 16.70s 32.20s
Waktu respons (maks) 309.35s 162.44s
Waktu respons (total) 367.47s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

low
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
3.7s
Token
1,203 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
54.8s
Token
5,247 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 8,138 660 1,060
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan