Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus

Ringkasan

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.294 vs $1.440. Muse Spark 1.1 (high) lebih cepat di 29.16s vs 30.70s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 69.8% vs 69.8%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.6 Plus (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 4.9x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-16

Metrik Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Rilis: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 7.8 7.8
Peringkat #41 #42
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.1 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 69.8% 69.8%
Tes tidak stabil 5 2
Total Run 61 63
Biaya per hasil 11.997 0.831
Total Biaya $1.440 $0.294
Harga input $1.250 / 1M $0.325 / 1M
Harga output $4.250 / 1M $1.950 / 1M
Total token input 64,900 41,565
Token output 3,577 1,853
Token penalaran 316,055 141,973
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 29.16s 30.70s
Waktu respons (maks) 196.03s 201.68s
Waktu respons (total) 583.18s 613.99s

Showcase generasi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Biaya
$0.039
Waktu
50.1s
Token
9,423 tok

#42 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Biaya
$0.024
Waktu
219.0s
Token
12,235 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan