Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Ringkasan

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.9 vs 7.8. Claude Sonnet 5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.550 vs $1.440. Claude Sonnet 5 (medium) lebih cepat di 9.94s vs 29.16s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 79.4% vs 69.8%.

Model yang direkomendasikanClaude Sonnet 5 (medium)It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 2.6x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-16

Metrik Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5 medium Rilis: 2026-06-30 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Rilis: 2026-07-16
Skor 7.9 7.8
Peringkat #40 #41
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.0 8.1
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 79.4% 69.8%
Tes tidak stabil 3 5
Total Run 63 61
Biaya per hasil 3.662 11.997
Total Biaya $0.550 $1.440
Harga input $2.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Harga output $10.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total token input 67,416 64,900
Token output 34,012 3,577
Token penalaran 7,673 316,055
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 9.94s 29.16s
Waktu respons (maks) 56.94s 196.03s
Waktu respons (total) 208.71s 583.18s

Showcase generasi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#40 Claude Sonnet 5

medium
Biaya
$0.007
Waktu
6.4s
Token
832 tok

#41 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Biaya
$0.039
Waktu
50.1s
Token
9,423 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Claude Sonnet 5 9.0 7.9 88.9% 1 17.28s 10,590 13,153 2,379
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan