- Peringkat
- #222
- Total token output
- 704,170
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 85.22s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (low) vs Grok 4.20 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.3 vs 6.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $1.246. Grok 4.20 (medium) lebih cepat di 36.73s vs 85.22s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 66.7% vs 58.0%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #228
- Total token output
- 302,087
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 36.73s
- Total Biaya
- $1.246
Model yang direkomendasikan
Grok 4.20 (medium)
It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 2.3x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low | Grok 4.20 Grok 4.20 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Peringkat | #222 | #228 |
| Keandalan | 9.7 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 66.7% | 58.0% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 5 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 14.374 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $1.246 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $1.250 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $2.500 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | T/A | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 271,890 | 392,127 |
| Token output | 190,841 | 7,754 |
| Token penalaran | 513,329 | 294,333 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 85.22s | 36.73s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 432.81s | 199.66s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1960.12s | 844.68s |
| Parameter | 560B total (25B aktif) | ~1T total (~100B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#222 Ling 3.1 Flash
low- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 133.5s
- Token
- 12,950 tok
#228 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.20
medium- Biaya
- $0.041
- Waktu
- 110.3s
- Token
- 16,336 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 101.51s | 148,137 | 12,034 | 14,574 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 128.32s | 289,141 | 1,894 | 29,934 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.16s | 750 | 1,268 | 3,167 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 83.3% | 1 | 3.95s | 2,010 | 287 | 8,312 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.6 | 4.2 | 66.7% | 2 | 107.30s | 8,298 | 20,816 | 86,330 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 6.3 | 6.6 | 55.6% | 1 | 109.93s | 8,307 | 268 | 103,150 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 235.14s | 95,366 | 29,960 | 91,357 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 8.7 | 6.9 | 83.3% | 1 | 42.25s | 71,267 | 3,776 | 44,009 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.83s | 8,016 | 1,507 | 4,078 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.17s | 7,761 | 180 | 5,333 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 274.59s | 837 | 118,155 | 260,533 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 49.71s | 1,959 | 872 | 59,761 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.47s | 546 | 10 | 2,835 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 24.48s | 825 | 65 | 6,440 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.82s | 744 | 324 | 1,374 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.26s | 1,362 | 57 | 6,419 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.9 | 7.8 | 88.9% | 1 | 32.80s | 747 | 4,505 | 31,642 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 6.22s | 1,689 | 149 | 7,913 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 24.17s | 8,221 | 884 | 6,373 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 13.68s | 7,275 | 197 | 6,620 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 40.69s | 228 | 1,378 | 11,066 | |
| Grok 4.20 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 63.48s | 531 | 9 | 16,442 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423nonevsGrok 4.20mediumLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSolar Pro 4highLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsGrok 4.20mediumDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsLing 3.1 FlashlowSpace Bunny AlphaxhighvsGrok 4.20mediumLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423nonevsLing 3.1 FlashlowLing 3.1 FlashlowvsLongCat 2.0noneQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsGrok 4.20medium