- Peringkat
- #336
- Total token output
- 923,276
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 68.08s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) vs Laguna S 2.1
Laguna S 2.1 unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.5 vs 3.8. Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.022. Laguna S 2.1 lebih cepat di 11.67s vs 68.08s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 24.2% vs 15.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #315
- Total token output
- 57,634
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 11.67s
- Total Biaya
- $0.022
Model yang direkomendasikan
Laguna S 2.1
It has the best score here (4.5), while responding about 5.8x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Tersedia gratis |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 3.8 | 4.5 |
| Peringkat | #336 | #315 |
| Keandalan | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 24.2% | 15.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 3 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 1.205 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $0.022 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $0.090 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $0.180 / 1M |
| Total token input | 103,898 | 125,604 |
| Token output | 148,304 | 57,634 |
| Token penalaran | 774,972 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 68.08s | 11.67s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 262.20s | 200.52s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1429.66s | 256.71s |
| Parameter | 7.9B total (1.3B aktif) | 118B total (8B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Sumber terbuka | Bobot tersedia |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#336 Ling 3.0 Tiny
medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 177.4s
- Token
- 6,873 tok
#315 Laguna S 2.1
none- Biaya
- $0.001
- Waktu
- 7.6s
- Token
- 1,345 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 23.73s | 750 | 5,103 | 94,884 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.1 | 7.9 | 8.3% | 1 | 835ms | 672 | 877 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.9 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 211.99s | 7,948 | 70,838 | 206,006 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.4 | 9.7 | 0.0% | 0 | 550ms | 7,917 | 424 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 139.78s | 76,108 | 17,871 | 126,497 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 21.62s | 99,668 | 10,893 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.7 | 5.7 | 16.7% | 1 | 4.41s | 8,016 | 2,014 | 6,755 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 537ms | 7,689 | 237 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 81.40s | 637 | 21,709 | 187,100 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 337ms | 771 | 18 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.8 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 1 | 31.77s | 546 | 4,275 | 30,975 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 815ms | 513 | 166 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.8 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 3.00s | 744 | 610 | 1,436 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 4.3 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 566ms | 702 | 54 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 34.65s | 747 | 15,561 | 85,029 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 828ms | 699 | 307 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.91s | 8,226 | 380 | 708 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.45s | 6,745 | 259 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 100.96s | 176 | 9,943 | 35,582 | |
| Laguna S 2.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 200.52s | 228 | 44,399 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
MiniMax M2.5mediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisLing 3.0 Tinymediumvsgpt-oss-120bnoneTersedia gratisLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGranite 4.2 8BhighvsLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisCobuddymediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisMercury 2.5nonevsLing 3.0 TinymediumLing 3.0 TinymediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneTersedia gratisGranite 4.1 8BnonevsLing 3.0 TinymediumLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisvsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratisvsLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisLing 3.0 TinymediumvsGrok 4.20none