Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 5.7 vs 5.7. Ling 3.0 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.041. Ling 3.0 Flash lebih cepat di 3.46s vs 4.03s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 27.3% vs 42.4%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGLM 5It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-24

Metrik Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Rilis: 2026-07-24 Tersedia gratis GLM 5 GLM 5 none Rilis: 2026-02-12
Skor 5.7 5.7
Peringkat #149 #148
Keandalan 9.9 10.0
Konsistensi 10.0 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 27.3% 42.4%
Tes tidak stabil 0 1
Total Run 66 63
Biaya per hasil 0.000 0.263
Total Biaya $0.000 $0.041
Harga input $0.000 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Harga output $0.000 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total token input 124,176 37,135
Token output 12,783 1,989
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 3.46s 4.03s
Waktu respons (maks) 17.51s 11.07s
Waktu respons (total) 76.06s 56.37s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
11.6s
Token
2,781 tok

#148 GLM 5

none
Biaya
$0.007
Waktu
32.1s
Token
2,023 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
GLM 5 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 5.12s 7,256 428 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan