Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 5.7 vs 5.7. Ling 3.0 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.247. Ling 3.0 Flash lebih cepat di 3.46s vs 12.92s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 27.3% vs 33.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanLing 3.0 FlashIt has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 3.7x faster than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-24

Metrik Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Rilis: 2026-07-24 Tersedia gratis Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 5.7 5.7
Peringkat #149 #150
Keandalan 9.9 10.0
Konsistensi 10.0 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 27.3% 33.3%
Tes tidak stabil 0 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.000 4.182
Total Biaya $0.000 $0.247
Harga input $0.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Harga output $0.000 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total token input 124,176 241,566
Token output 12,783 88,458
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 3.46s 12.92s
Waktu respons (maks) 17.51s 212.63s
Waktu respons (total) 76.06s 284.21s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
11.6s
Token
2,781 tok

#150 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Biaya
$0.016
Waktu
44.5s
Token
6,431 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan