Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Laguna XS 2.1 unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 5.3 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.002 vs $0.008. Laguna XS 2.1 lebih cepat di 1.55s vs 10.68s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 30.3% vs 30.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanLaguna XS 2.1It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 6.9x faster than Ling-2.6-flash.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-21

Metrik Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Rilis: 2026-04-21 Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 none Rilis: 2026-07-02 Tersedia gratis
Skor 4.9 5.3
Peringkat #184 #166
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.3 9.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 30.3% 30.3%
Tes tidak stabil 2 3
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.024 0.143
Total Biaya $0.002 $0.008
Harga input $0.010 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Harga output $0.030 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total token input 114,375 91,598
Token output 14,903 13,377
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 10.68s 1.55s
Waktu respons (maks) 36.03s 19.02s
Waktu respons (total) 213.51s 34.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#184 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.0s
Token
0 tok

#166 Laguna XS 2.1

none
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
27.6s
Token
4,344 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
Laguna XS 2.1 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 623ms 7,995 562 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan