- Peringkat
- #189
- Total token output
- 96,943
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 4.40s
- Total Biaya
- $0.121
Mercury 2 (medium) vs GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.6 vs 6.6. Mercury 2 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.121 vs $0.152. Mercury 2 (medium) lebih cepat di 4.40s vs 11.27s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 53.6% vs 63.8%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #186
- Total token output
- 17,685
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 11.27s
- Total Biaya
- $0.152
Model yang direkomendasikan
Mercury 2 (medium)
Its score stays close to the best score here (6.6 vs 6.6), while responding about 2.6x faster than GLM 5.2.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Mercury 2 Mercury 2 medium | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Peringkat | #189 | #186 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.1 | 9.0 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 53.6% | 63.8% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 3 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 1.201 | 1.753 |
| Total Biaya | $0.121 | $0.152 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.325 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.750 / 1M | $3.990 / 1M |
| Total token input | 189,300 | 247,919 |
| Token output | 10,854 | 17,685 |
| Token penalaran | 86,089 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 4.40s | 11.27s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 34.92s | 79.65s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 96.81s | 259.32s |
| Parameter | ~100B | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#189 Mercury 2
medium- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 2.1s
- Token
- 1,702 tok
#186 GLM 5.2
none- Biaya
- $0.033
- Waktu
- 87.7s
- Token
- 7,455 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Mercury 2mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashhighQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2noneMercury 2mediumvsLongCat 2.0lowMercury 2mediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowLongCat 2.0lowvsGLM 5.2noneEmber-1maxvsGLM 5.2noneMiniMax M3mediumvsGLM 5.2noneGrok 4.7highvsGLM 5.2noneSolar Pro 4lowvsGLM 5.2noneStep 3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2noneMercury 2mediumvsGPT-5.5noneMercury 2mediumvsGLM 5.3 Flashlow