- Peringkat
- #179
- Total token output
- 487,184
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 122.19s
- Total Biaya
- $3.582
Grok 4.7 (high) vs GLM 5.2
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.7 vs 6.6. GLM 5.2 memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.152 vs $3.582. GLM 5.2 lebih cepat di 11.27s vs 122.19s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 72.5% vs 63.8%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #186
- Total token output
- 17,685
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 11.27s
- Total Biaya
- $0.152
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.2
It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 23.7x less than Grok 4.7 (high).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Grok 4.7 Grok 4.7 high | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Peringkat | #179 | #186 |
| Keandalan | 9.6 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.7 | 9.0 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 72.5% | 63.8% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 7 | 3 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 23.360 | 1.753 |
| Total Biaya | $3.582 | $0.152 |
| Harga input | $2.000 / 1M | $0.325 / 1M |
| Harga output | $6.000 / 1M | $3.990 / 1M |
| Total token input | 329,276 | 247,919 |
| Token output | 8,172 | 17,685 |
| Token penalaran | 479,012 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 122.19s | 11.27s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 573.57s | 79.65s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 2810.40s | 259.32s |
| Parameter | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#179 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7
high- Biaya
- $0.110
- Waktu
- 301.3s
- Token
- 23,143 tok
#186 GLM 5.2
none- Biaya
- $0.033
- Waktu
- 87.7s
- Token
- 7,455 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
MiniMax M3mediumvsGrok 4.7highEmber-1maxvsGrok 4.7highGPT 5.3 ChatnonevsGrok 4.7highGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGrok 4.7highSolar Pro 4lowvsGrok 4.7highQwen3.5-FlashnonevsGrok 4.7highQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2noneLongCat 2.0lowvsGLM 5.2noneGrok 4.7highvsGLM 5.3 FlashlowGPT-5.5nonevsGrok 4.7highEmber-1maxvsGLM 5.2noneMiniMax M3mediumvsGLM 5.2none