Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Granite 4.2 8B unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.3 vs 4.0. Ling 3.0 Tiny memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.026. Ling 3.0 Tiny lebih cepat di 14.02s vs 86.27s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 16.7% vs 9.1%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-02

Peringkat
#285
Total token output
130,805
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
86.27s
Total Biaya
$0.026
Peringkat
#291
Total token output
110,071
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
14.02s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan Ling 3.0 Tiny

Its score stays close to the best score here (4.0 vs 4.3), while responding about 6.2x faster than Granite 4.2 8B.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B none Rilis: 2026-09-02 Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny none Rilis: 2026-08-07
Skor 4.3 4.0
Peringkat #285 #291
Keandalan 8.6 9.8
Konsistensi 9.3 10.0
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 16.7% 9.1%
Tes tidak stabil 2 0
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.847 0.000
Total Biaya $0.026 $0.000
Harga input $0.100 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Harga output $0.150 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total token input 57,786 184,579
Token output 130,805 110,071
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 86.27s 14.02s
Waktu respons (maks) 747.17s 240.61s
Waktu respons (total) 1897.96s 294.46s
Parameter 8B 7.9B total (1.3B aktif)
Ketersediaan Sumber terbuka Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#285 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B

none
Provider returned error
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.2s
Token
0 tok

#291 Ling 3.0 Tiny

none
SVG tidak valid
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
334.1s
Token
32,913 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Granite 4.2 8B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 105.60s 8,358 47,944 0
Ling 3.0 Tiny 4.2 10.0 0.0% 0 1.19s 8,307 798 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Granite 4.2 8BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumGranite 4.2 8BnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGranite 4.2 8BnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumCobuddymediumvsGranite 4.2 8BnoneGranite 4.2 8BnonevsLing 3.0 TinyhighGranite 4.2 8BnonevsLing 3.0 TinylowGranite 4.2 8BnonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumGranite 4.2 8BnonevsLing 3.0 TinymediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGranite 4.2 8BnoneGranite 4.2 8BnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratis