- Peringkat
- #275
- Total token output
- 17,306
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 10.55s
- Total Biaya
- $0.023
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 5.5 vs 5.5. Ling 3.1 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.023. Gemma 4 26B A4B lebih cepat di 10.55s vs 15.75s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 42.0% vs 33.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #272
- Total token output
- 85,777
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 15.75s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemma 4 26B A4B
It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B none Tersedia gratis | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Peringkat | #275 | #272 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.8 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 42.0% | 33.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 5 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.339 | 0.000 |
| Total Biaya | $0.023 | $0.000 |
| Harga input | $0.068 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.225 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | $0.038 / 1M | T/A |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 280,126 | 286,758 |
| Token output | 17,306 | 85,777 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 10.55s | 15.75s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 75.76s | 90.95s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 242.57s | 362.23s |
| Parameter | 25.2B total (3.8B aktif) | 560B total (25B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Sumber terbuka | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#275 Gemma 4 26B A4B
none- Biaya
- $0.001
- Waktu
- 39.5s
- Token
- 790 tok
#272 Ling 3.1 Flash
none- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 171.4s
- Token
- 20,178 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 75.76s | 148,869 | 1,525 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 68.68s | 163,444 | 9,213 | 0 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 1.28s | 852 | 230 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.6 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.02s | 762 | 1,298 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 3.7 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 4.16s | 7,736 | 476 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.5 | 7.5 | 22.2% | 1 | 31.85s | 8,307 | 27,810 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 37.23s | 104,894 | 14,266 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 25.41s | 92,441 | 8,416 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.70s | 8,352 | 285 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.27s | 8,022 | 249 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 2.10s | 878 | 27 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.72s | 846 | 331 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.54s | 576 | 85 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.41s | 549 | 131 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 690ms | 795 | 75 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.0 | 6.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.22s | 750 | 78 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 6.2 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 744ms | 828 | 114 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.31s | 756 | 2,073 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 57.10s | 6,123 | 210 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 4.66s | 10,650 | 303 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 778ms | 223 | 13 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 90.95s | 231 | 35,875 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ling 3.1 FlashnonevsNemotron 3 SupermediumTersedia gratisGemma 4 26B A4BnoneTersedia gratisvsNemotron 3 SupermediumTersedia gratisNorth Mini CodemediumTersedia gratisvsGemma 4 26B A4BnoneTersedia gratisGemma 4 26B A4BnoneTersedia gratisvsHy4 previewlowNorth Mini CodemediumTersedia gratisvsLing 3.1 FlashnoneLing 3.1 FlashnonevsHy4 previewlowGemma 4 26B A4BnoneTersedia gratisvsStep 3.5 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashnonevsStep 3.5 FlashmediumGemma 4 26B A4BnoneTersedia gratisvsGranite 4.2 8BlowGranite 4.2 8BlowvsLing 3.1 FlashnoneLing 3.1 FlashnonevsSpace Bunny AlphalowGemma 4 26B A4BnoneTersedia gratisvsSpace Bunny Alphalow