- Peringkat
- #287
- Total token output
- 61,351
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 58.20s
- Total Biaya
- $0.036
Granite 4.2 8B (low) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 5.5 vs 5.3. Ling 3.1 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.036. Ling 3.1 Flash lebih cepat di 15.75s vs 58.20s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 33.3% vs 33.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #272
- Total token output
- 85,777
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 15.75s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan
Ling 3.1 Flash
It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 3.7x faster than Granite 4.2 8B (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B low | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 5.3 | 5.5 |
| Peringkat | #287 | #272 |
| Keandalan | 9.2 | 9.8 |
| Konsistensi | 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 33.3% | 33.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 5 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.508 | 0.000 |
| Total Biaya | $0.036 | $0.000 |
| Harga input | $0.060 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.250 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | $0.015 / 1M | T/A |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 332,917 | 286,758 |
| Token output | 18,989 | 85,777 |
| Token penalaran | 42,362 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 58.20s | 15.75s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 566.80s | 90.95s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1338.65s | 362.23s |
| Parameter | 8B | 560B total (25B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Sumber terbuka | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#287 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B
low
Provider returned error
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 0.2s
- Token
- 0 tok
#272 Ling 3.1 Flash
none- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 171.4s
- Token
- 20,178 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 142.68s | 258,196 | 9,784 | 23,639 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 68.68s | 163,444 | 9,213 | 0 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 11.68s | 777 | 1,463 | 898 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.6 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.02s | 762 | 1,298 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 13.01s | 8,439 | 2,469 | 2,984 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.5 | 7.5 | 22.2% | 1 | 31.85s | 8,307 | 27,810 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 298.21s | 46,805 | 4,085 | 13,637 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 25.41s | 92,441 | 8,416 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.39s | 7,683 | 270 | 75 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.27s | 8,022 | 249 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 26.16s | 876 | 154 | 290 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.72s | 846 | 331 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 659ms | 561 | 108 | 24 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.41s | 549 | 131 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 75.80s | 402 | 84 | 378 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.0 | 6.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.22s | 750 | 78 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 90.84s | 517 | 181 | 82 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.31s | 756 | 2,073 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.23s | 8,412 | 358 | 265 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 4.66s | 10,650 | 303 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.53s | 249 | 33 | 90 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 90.95s | 231 | 35,875 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Granite 4.2 8BlowvsGPT-5.6 LunanoneGranite 4.2 8BlowvsKimi K2.5noneEmber-1nonevsGranite 4.2 8BlowGranite 4.2 8BlowvsStep 3.5 FlashmediumGranite 4.2 8BlowvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashnoneLing 3.1 FlashnonevsNemotron 3 SupermediumTersedia gratisGranite 4.2 8BlowvsLaguna XS 2.1noneTersedia gratisGranite 4.2 8BlowvsQwen3.6 35B A3BnoneNorth Mini CodemediumTersedia gratisvsGranite 4.2 8BlowNorth Mini CodemediumTersedia gratisvsLing 3.1 FlashnoneLing 3.1 FlashnonevsHy4 previewlowGranite 4.2 8BlowvsQwen3.8 27BnoneTersedia gratis