- Peringkat
- #272
- Total token output
- 85,777
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 15.75s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash vs Step 3.5 Flash (medium)
Ling 3.1 Flash unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 5.5 vs 5.4. Ling 3.1 Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.105. Ling 3.1 Flash lebih cepat di 15.75s vs 190.48s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 33.3% vs 49.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #283
- Total token output
- 607,130
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 190.48s
- Total Biaya
- $0.105
Model yang direkomendasikan
Ling 3.1 Flash
It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 12.1x faster than Step 3.5 Flash (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash none | Step 3.5 Flash Step 3.5 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 5.5 | 5.4 |
| Peringkat | #272 | #283 |
| Keandalan | 9.8 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 66/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 33.3% | 49.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 3 |
| Total Run | 69 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 1.047 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $0.105 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $0.100 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | T/A | T/A |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 286,758 | 139,086 |
| Token output | 85,777 | 193,584 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 413,546 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 15.75s | 190.48s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 90.95s | 1597.85s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 362.23s | 3238.23s |
| Parameter | 560B total (25B aktif) | 196B total (11B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#272 Ling 3.1 Flash
none- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 171.4s
- Token
- 20,178 tok
#283 Step 3.5 Flash
medium- Biaya
- $0.008
- Waktu
- 277.1s
- Token
- 23,695 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 68.68s | 163,444 | 9,213 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 172.16s | 73,370 | 4,160 | 34,434 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.6 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.02s | 762 | 1,298 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 40.57s | 694 | 20,391 | 24,176 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.5 | 7.5 | 22.2% | 1 | 31.85s | 8,307 | 27,810 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 2.4 | 5.2 | 0.0% | 0 | 258.38s | 2,211 | 13,207 | 22,429 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 25.41s | 92,441 | 8,416 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 813.71s | 44,914 | 18,150 | 111,004 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.27s | 8,022 | 249 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.01s | 7,368 | 600 | 13,886 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.72s | 846 | 331 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 3.5 | 4.4 | 33.3% | 2 | 311.60s | 682 | 126,213 | 175,555 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.41s | 549 | 131 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 22.39s | 509 | 240 | 3,506 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.0 | 6.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.22s | 750 | 78 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 8.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.78s | 705 | 2,364 | 3,521 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.31s | 756 | 2,073 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 7.22s | 711 | 5,630 | 10,861 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 4.66s | 10,650 | 303 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.91s | 7,701 | 275 | 3,802 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 90.95s | 231 | 35,875 | 0 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 108.45s | 221 | 2,354 | 10,372 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Step 3.5 FlashmediumvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashnoneEmber-1nonevsStep 3.5 FlashmediumStep 3.5 FlashmediumvsHy4 previewlowGPT-5.6 LunanonevsStep 3.5 FlashmediumGranite 4.2 8BlowvsStep 3.5 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashnonevsNemotron 3 SupermediumTersedia gratisKimi K2.5nonevsStep 3.5 FlashmediumQwen3.8 27BnoneTersedia gratisvsStep 3.5 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-CodenonevsStep 3.5 FlashmediumNorth Mini CodemediumTersedia gratisvsLing 3.1 FlashnoneLing 3.1 FlashnonevsHy4 previewlowLaguna XS 2.1noneTersedia gratisvsStep 3.5 Flashmedium