Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.5 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.082 vs $0.369. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) lebih cepat di 6.01s vs 32.20s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 69.7% vs 69.7%.

Model yang direkomendasikanMiMo-V2.5 (medium)It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 4.5x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-21

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Rilis: 2026-07-21 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Rilis: 2026-04-22
Skor 6.5 6.5
Peringkat #104 #107
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 7.4 7.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 69.7% 69.7%
Tes tidak stabil 7 6
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 3.074 3.124
Total Biaya $0.369 $0.082
Harga input $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Harga output $2.500 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total token input 118,818 105,447
Token output 11,677 7,120
Token penalaran 121,611 230,682
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 6.01s 32.20s
Waktu respons (maks) 49.03s 162.44s
Waktu respons (total) 132.30s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Biaya
$0.015
Waktu
16.4s
Token
5,971 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
54.8s
Token
5,247 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan