Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.7 vs 6.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.145 vs $0.391. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) lebih cepat di 2.25s vs 100.31s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 66.7% vs 53.0%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 2.7x less than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-21

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Rilis: 2026-07-21 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Rilis: 2026-07-20
Skor 6.7 6.7
Peringkat #95 #96
Keandalan 10.0 9.6
Konsistensi 8.2 8.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 66.7% 53.0%
Tes tidak stabil 5 3
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 1.201 3.910
Total Biaya $0.145 $0.391
Harga input $0.300 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Harga output $2.500 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total token input 144,622 90,909
Token output 15,302 5,679
Token penalaran 24,971 297,369
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 2.25s 100.31s
Waktu respons (maks) 13.50s 560.39s
Waktu respons (total) 49.58s 2206.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Biaya
$0.008
Waktu
7.7s
Token
3,056 tok

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Biaya
$0.024
Waktu
428.0s
Token
19,557 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan