#118 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
none- Biaya
- $0.001
- Waktu
- 4.5s
- Token
- 727 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5
Ringkasan
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.013 vs $0.064. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lebih cepat di 1.06s vs 11.02s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 52.4% vs 46.0%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.1 Flash LiteIts score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 4.9x less than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Peringkat | #118 | #110 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.7 |
| Konsistensi | 8.6 | 7.6 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 52.4% | 46.0% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 4 | 6 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.144 | 0.910 |
| Total Biaya | $0.013 | $0.064 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Harga output | $1.500 / 1M | $0.600 / 1M |
| Total token input | 36,710 | 41,748 |
| Token output | 2,484 | 3,894 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 91,773 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 1.06s | 11.02s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 2.97s | 104.98s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 22.35s | 231.37s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#110 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5
high
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 938ms | 8,128 | 666 | 0 | |
| KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | 4.3 | 7.3 | 11.1% | 1 | 39.07s | 6,948 | 1,166 | 55,883 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Seed-2.0-LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highvsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highvsGPT-5.5noneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highvsGPT-5.6 SolnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highvsNemotron 3 SupermediumTersedia gratisGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5low