Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 4.8 vs 4.8. Trinity Large Preview memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.008 vs $0.016. Trinity Large Preview lebih cepat di 2.98s vs 8.81s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 21.2% vs 30.3%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-08-15

Peringkat
#254
Total token output
2,169
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
2.98s
Total Biaya
$0.008
Peringkat
#253
Total token output
22,992
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
8.81s
Total Biaya
$0.016
Model yang direkomendasikan Trinity Large Preview

It has the best score here (4.8), while costing about 2.0x less than GLM 4.7 Flash.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Rilis: 2026-01-27 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash none Rilis: 2026-01-19
Skor 4.8 4.8
Peringkat #254 #253
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.9 8.9
Percobaan 63/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 21.2% 30.3%
Tes tidak stabil 2 3
Total Run 63 66
Biaya per hasil 0.017 0.307
Total Biaya $0.008 $0.016
Harga input $0.243 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Harga output $0.243 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total token input 29,828 101,513
Token output 2,169 22,992
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 2.98s 8.81s
Waktu respons (maks) 14.34s 97.15s
Waktu respons (total) 56.57s 140.88s
Parameter 398B total (13B aktif) 30B total (3B aktif)
Ketersediaan Sumber terbuka Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#254 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.0s
Token
0 tok

#253 GLM 4.7 Flash

none
SVG tidak valid
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
300.0s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 2.54s 7,256 650 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratisvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large PreviewnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratisTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large PreviewnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large PreviewnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumMiniMax M2.5mediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneLaguna S 2.1lowTersedia gratisvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large PreviewnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowTersedia gratisMiniMax M2.7mediumvsGLM 4.7 Flashnone