Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Inkling unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 5.2 vs 4.8. Trinity Large Preview memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.008 vs $0.147. Trinity Large Preview lebih cepat di 2.98s vs 3.50s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 21.2% vs 28.8%.

Model yang direkomendasikanTrinity Large PreviewIts score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 5.2), while costing about 19.0x less than Inkling.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Rilis: 2026-01-27 Inkling Inkling none Rilis: 2026-07-18
Skor 4.8 5.2
Peringkat #179 #160
Keandalan 10.0 9.9
Konsistensi 8.9 9.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 21.2% 28.8%
Tes tidak stabil 2 1
Total Run 63 66
Biaya per hasil 0.017 2.448
Total Biaya $0.008 $0.147
Harga input $0.243 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Harga output $0.243 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total token input 29,828 104,111
Token output 2,169 10,551
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 2.98s 3.50s
Waktu respons (maks) 14.34s 48.02s
Waktu respons (total) 56.57s 77.09s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.0s
Token
0 tok

#160 Thinking Machines: Inkling

none
Provider returned error
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
5.3s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Inkling 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.01s 7,356 436 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan