Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Preview vs OpenAI: GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.3 vs 4.8. Trinity Large Preview memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.008 vs $1.253. Trinity Large Preview lebih cepat di 2.98s vs 10.13s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 21.2% vs 86.4%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGPT-5.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Rilis: 2026-01-27 GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Rilis: 2026-04-24
Skor 4.8 9.3
Peringkat #179 #6
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.9 10.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 21.2% 86.4%
Tes tidak stabil 2 0
Total Run 63 66
Biaya per hasil 0.017 6.594
Total Biaya $0.008 $1.253
Harga input $0.243 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Harga output $0.243 / 1M $30.000 / 1M
Total token input 29,828 80,058
Token output 2,169 5,378
Token penalaran 0 23,040
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 2.98s 10.13s
Waktu respons (maks) 14.34s 56.19s
Waktu respons (total) 56.57s 222.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.0s
Token
0 tok

#6 GPT-5.5

low
Biaya
$0.068
Waktu
37.0s
Token
2,339 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan