Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.6 vs 4.8. Trinity Large Preview memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.008 vs $0.742. Trinity Large Preview lebih cepat di 2.98s vs 19.20s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 21.2% vs 98.5%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3 Flash Preview (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Rilis: 2026-01-27 Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Rilis: 2025-12-17
Skor 4.8 9.6
Peringkat #179 #1
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.9 9.7
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 21.2% 98.5%
Tes tidak stabil 2 1
Total Run 63 66
Biaya per hasil 0.017 3.533
Total Biaya $0.008 $0.742
Harga input $0.243 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Harga output $0.243 / 1M $3.000 / 1M
Total token input 29,828 87,861
Token output 2,169 5,486
Token penalaran 0 227,164
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 2.98s 19.20s
Waktu respons (maks) 14.34s 117.26s
Waktu respons (total) 56.57s 422.42s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.0s
Token
0 tok

#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview

medium
Biaya
$0.010
Waktu
18.4s
Token
3,351 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 84.40s 8,122 462 161,084

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan