- Peringkat
- #232
- Total token output
- 28,630
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 5.68s
- Total Biaya
- $0.620
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.047 vs $0.620. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) lebih cepat di 1.85s vs 5.68s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 43.9% vs 51.5%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #234
- Total token output
- 11,118
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 1.85s
- Total Biaya
- $0.047
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)
It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 13.3x less than Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 low | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Peringkat | #232 | #234 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 43.9% | 51.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 3 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 6.880 | 0.465 |
| Total Biaya | $0.620 | $0.047 |
| Harga input | $2.000 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M |
| Harga output | $10.000 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
| Total token input | 166,418 | 119,076 |
| Token output | 21,456 | 11,118 |
| Token penalaran | 7,174 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 5.68s | 1.85s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 22.74s | 12.97s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 124.87s | 40.74s |
| Parameter | ~1T total (~100B aktif) | ~150B total (~10B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#232 Claude Sonnet 5.5
low- Biaya
- $0.020
- Waktu
- 15.3s
- Token
- 2,077 tok
#234 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
minimal- Biaya
- $0.001
- Waktu
- 3.7s
- Token
- 635 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 2.55s | 858 | 1,736 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 1.10s | 500 | 639 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 3.2 | 9.7 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.81s | 10,608 | 5,903 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 831ms | 8,126 | 666 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 7.9 | 6.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 22.50s | 128,879 | 7,220 | 4,027 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.75s | 94,962 | 8,988 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.31s | 10,515 | 312 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.04s | 7,552 | 279 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 8.09s | 990 | 3,974 | 2,570 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 972ms | 652 | 15 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 33.3% | 1 | 2.33s | 714 | 374 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 791ms | 490 | 63 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.91s | 921 | 357 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 932ms | 615 | 72 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 2.50s | 912 | 892 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 6.0 | 4.6 | 66.7% | 2 | 2.15s | 564 | 153 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.67s | 11,757 | 354 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.51s | 5,457 | 234 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.97s | 264 | 334 | 577 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 724ms | 158 | 9 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Sonnet 5.5lowvsGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisClaude Sonnet 5nonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalClaude Sonnet 5.5lowvsSeed-2.0-LitenoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5lowvsMiMo-V2.6-PrononeGemini 3.1 Flash Liteminimalvsgpt-oss-120bmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsGPT-5.6 LunalowGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsInklinglowSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalClaude Sonnet 5.5lowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3Bmedium