Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Opus 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.5 vs 8.6. Claude Opus 5 (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $1.121 vs $1.976. Claude Opus 5 (low) lebih cepat di 6.99s vs 15.07s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 80.3% vs 93.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikanClaude Opus 5 (low)It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (8.6), lower cost than Gemini 3.5 Flash (high), and balanced response time.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 low Rilis: 2026-07-25 Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Rilis: 2026-05-19
Skor 8.6 9.5
Peringkat #23 #4
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.3 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 80.3% 93.9%
Tes tidak stabil 2 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 6.593 9.879
Total Biaya $1.121 $1.976
Harga input $5.000 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Harga output $25.000 / 1M $9.000 / 1M
Total token input 134,773 107,137
Token output 14,123 8,777
Token penalaran 3,896 192,900
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 6.99s 15.07s
Waktu respons (maks) 30.67s 145.92s
Waktu respons (total) 153.73s 331.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#23 Claude Opus 5

low
Biaya
$0.062
Waktu
30.2s
Token
2,615 tok

#4 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Biaya
$0.208
Waktu
118.2s
Token
23,158 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Claude Opus 5 7.8 7.4 77.8% 1 6.70s 10,590 2,442 760
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan