Navigasi
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Haiku 5.5 (low) vs Qwen3.8 27B (high)

Qwen3.8 27B (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.7 vs 8.6. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.061 vs ~$0.298. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low) lebih cepat di 7.51s vs 166.34s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 76.8% vs 78.3%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-10-07

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#64
Total token output
61,650
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
7.51s
Total Biaya
$0.061
Peringkat
#56
Total token output
677,080
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
166.34s
Total Biaya
~$0.298
Model yang direkomendasikan Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.6 vs 8.7), while costing about 4.9x less than Qwen3.8 27B (high).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Haiku 5.5 low Rilis: 2026-10-07 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Rilis: 2026-08-14 Tersedia gratis
Skor 8.6 8.7
Peringkat #64 #56
Keandalan 10.0 9.7
Konsistensi 8.9 9.2
Percobaan 69/69 69/69
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 76.8% 78.3%
Tes tidak stabil 3 2
Total Run 69 69
Biaya per hasil 0.378 ~1.751
Total Biaya $0.061 ~$0.298
Harga input $0.100 / 1M T/A
Harga output $0.500 / 1M T/A
Harga baca cache $0.010 / 1M T/A
Harga tulis cache $0.125 / 1M T/A
Total token input 296,301 348,967
Token output 10,672 1,005
Token penalaran 50,978 676,075
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 7.51s 166.34s
Waktu respons (maks) 44.43s 640.85s
Waktu respons (total) 172.74s 3825.81s
Parameter ~50B 27.3B
Ketersediaan Tertutup Bobot tersedia

Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#64 Claude Haiku 5.5

low
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
7.4s
Token
1,851 tok

#56 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Biaya
~$0.008
Waktu
270.1s
Token
18,963 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Claude Haiku 5.5 7.9 7.5 77.8% 1 7.30s 10,608 531 11,618
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

GPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisvsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisGPT-6 SollowvsQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisClaude Haiku 5.5lowvsGrok 4.6highDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisClaude Haiku 5.5lowvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxMuse Spark 1.2lowvsQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisClaude Haiku 5.5lowvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisMuse Spark 1.1lowvsQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisClaude Haiku 5.5lowvsSeed 2.1 Turbomedium