Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Claude Fable 5 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.6 vs 8.3. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.647 vs $3.478. Muse Spark 1.1 (low) lebih cepat di 11.45s vs 17.20s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 78.8% vs 69.7%.

Model yang direkomendasikanMuse Spark 1.1 (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.3 vs 8.6), while costing about 5.4x less than Claude Fable 5 (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium Rilis: 2026-06-10 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 low Rilis: 2026-07-16
Skor 8.6 8.3
Peringkat #17 #24
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.6 8.5
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 78.8% 69.7%
Tes tidak stabil 1 4
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 20.459 4.975
Total Biaya $3.478 $0.647
Harga input $10.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Harga output $50.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total token input 89,643 142,298
Token output 41,360 10,847
Token penalaran 10,269 99,467
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 17.20s 11.45s
Waktu respons (maks) 80.80s 54.15s
Waktu respons (total) 378.41s 251.92s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#17 Claude Fable 5

medium
Biaya
$0.606
Waktu
156.7s
Token
12,264 tok

#24 Muse Spark 1.1

low
Biaya
$0.020
Waktu
39.2s
Token
4,947 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Claude Fable 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.59s 10,590 7,383 1,318
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.34s 8,562 394 14,503

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan