Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.7 vs 6.8. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.153 vs $0.257. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.65s vs 13.65s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#138
Total Output Tokens
14,344
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.153
Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
24,808
Response Time (avg)
13.65s
Total Cost
$0.257
Recommended model GLM 5.2

It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 1.7x less than GLM 5.3 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 low Release: 2026-08-20
Score 6.7 6.8
Rank #138 #134
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.312 2.135
Total Cost $0.153 $0.257
Input Price $0.966 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $3.036 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 112,458 104,989
Output Tokens 14,344 8,532
Reasoning Tokens 0 16,276
Response Time (avg) 9.65s 13.65s
Response Time (max) 79.65s 83.60s
Response Time (total) 212.38s 300.22s
Parameters 744B total (40B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#138 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

#134 GLM 5.3

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
28.4s
Tokens
1,599 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0
GLM 5.3 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 21.02s 7,317 368 6,764

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair