Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

The average score is effectively tied at 5.5 vs 5.5. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower benchmark cost at $0.068 vs $0.164. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 4.12s vs 6.70s, with pass rates of 37.9% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5-ProIt has the best score here (5.5), while costing about 2.4x less than GLM 5.1.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 5.5 5.5
Rank #160 #157
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 37.9% 40.9%
Flaky tests 4 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.509 2.368
Total Cost $0.068 $0.164
Input Price $0.435 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.870 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,799 124,209
Output Tokens 15,362 14,393
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.12s 6.70s
Response Time (max) 53.13s 61.20s
Response Time (total) 90.55s 147.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#160 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

#157 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair